1662523991340-removebg-preview

Winning “The True Paul Newman 50 Years Later

Winning “The True Paul Newman 50 Years Later
Winning Movie Poster 1
Release date
May 1969
Director
James Goldstone
Starring
Paul Newman
Joanne Woodward
Robert Wagner
rating " Run Time "
M / 2h 3m
Fun
Richard Thomas’s first big performance credit.
Where to see

Dissemination of participants:As Amazon Associate, Automoblog wins the qualifying purchases, including the movies that appear here. These commissions come to us at no additional cost to you.

Although now it’s older than most car movies,Winningis a good test of the American race scene in the late 1960s. It is also worth noting that, because of this film, Paul Newman entered the races.WinningIt’s one of those weird car-oriented movies that takes its subject seriously and treats it with the recognition it deserves.

Living two lives

Winningis a 1969 drama about professional rider Frank Capua (Newman). After winning a CanAm race in Elkhart Lake, Frank knows Elora (played by Newman’s wife, Joanne Woodward). After a whirlwind romance, Frank and Elora get married. Elora has a teenage son of his first marriage, Charley (Richard Thomas), and they both become very close; Frank becomes a necessary father figure, and Charlie gives a very necessary basis to Frank’s life.

But, like many runners, Frank is so obsessed with what makes him start neglecting his marriage. Elora has an affair with Frank’s main rival and teammate, Luther “Lou” Erding (Robert Wagner). Frank finds them in bed together at The Speedway Motel while preparing for The Indy 500. After leaving in a silent anger, the couple separates. Frank still sees Charley, but his growing resentment towards Elora and Lou fuels his commitment to careers.

In Indianapolis 500, Elora and Charley watch while Frank makes a half-pack charge to win. Frank’s post-race world becomes a boron of parties, desires, cheerful hands and padding. Everything is built from there in the middle of the century, the glory of Panavision. The color is washed, the angles of the camera can be extreme, and the edition is anchored in the style of time.Winningwas led by James Goldstone, an old school helmer traveler. It is also worth mentioning to lead the second pilot Star Trek that got the Greenlit show.

Truth vs. fiction in winning

The fact that Newman and Woodward were husband and wife of real life makes all their scenes break with an energy that is impossible to forge. InWinningPaul Newman is all Steve McQueen wants me to be. He’s a better actor, better runner, better looking and married to Joanne Woodward.

Newman was an extremely complex individual. It was rare in the acting world to the extent that it was notget to know each other completely. Normally, a deep understanding of what you are and what drives you is crucial to being an actor and easily apparent to those who observe you. By his own admission, Newman did not understand himself very well. I had no idea what motivated him to respond to certain situations in certain ways. Most people in this condition would take psychoanalysis, but Newman did his therapy through his performance. You can see it from being puzzled in their previous films to more self-consciousness the more he acted.

Case in point is the movieWinning. Sure, there’s one last scene with him and Woodward – those kids were crazy.for the other – but it is the scenes with Richard Thomas that sound true with a terrifying intensity. The story is that Paul Newman was having problems with his son, Scott, while he was filming (his only son too). Scott was a tragic individual, and adding to his personal calamities was that he was raised by a father who wasn’t all there, emotionally speaking. What Scott needed to survive, Paul was incapable of giving. And Paul Newman realized this. He understood that his son was drowning, but he couldn’t swim.

As often happens in situations like this, it is manifested in long and unbridled arguments. So when you see the on-screen tension between Capua and his fictitious son Charley, you realize that moments before, Newman was probably arguing with his real son. Scott Newman died of a fatal overdose of valium in November 1978 (The Scott Newman Center was later established in his honor).

Winning: The Racing Life of Paul Newman, by Matt Stone and Preston Lerner, published by Motorbooks.
From Winning: Paul Newman’s career lifeby Matt Stone and Preston Lerner, published by Motorbooks.

Winner Cleaners The Lines

As a film for a general public, the biggest problem is howWinningTry to be two things at once. If I had to reduce the emphasis on racing,Winningwould be an interesting look at a relationship between two emotionally injured people. With Woodward and Newman, you have the power to act out. On the contrary, if you were to limit the things of the relationship, you would have a great, if not too direct, racing movie. It could have been, but it tried to be both, and in that sense, Winning does not work completely (the deceased Roger Ebert There were feelings found about him too).

What works unequivocally?It’s the performance, even if the script is quite handy. The old industry joke is like, “Acting is acting like you’re not acting, so act, but don’t act like you’re acting.” It’s strange to think, but somehow, Paul Newman wasn’t acting long. Despite all his natural talent, Newman fought to be an actor, and took him decades to enter the forest as good as he did.

InWinningWe see a guy playing a guy who doesn’t know why he’s more interested in his job than in his relationship; a guy who fights to connect with a child he loves. Are we seeing Frank Capua at that scene or the real Paul Newman? I don’t know, and I bet even Newman couldn’t say for sure.

Should you watch him win?

Besides being the movie that led Paul Newman to the races, a gift that we can all be grateful for, there are a lot of attractions and sounds to enjoy. There is a full CanAm race on Road America and a cool rally segment with a Mini Cooper boss. There is a walking tour of the old Riverside road anda Riverside Stock car racing. A great “blink and you will lose it” moment is the inscription “If you can read this, please turn the right side up” on the Capua mediator – which then ends up rolling. And what about that gold metal shark Manx Dune Buggy Frank built for Charlie?

And then the old Indy scenes like the gas alley with the garage stables (burned), the Speedway Motel where all the drivers and crews stayed (round 2), USAC guys in gold-footed helmets, and a young Johnny Rutherford cameo shaking Newman’s hand after qualifying. The accident at first is taken directly from the Indy 500 of 1966.

This is one that all gears should look again if it has been a while, and if you are a younger enthusiast, I recommend it too. From this writing,Winningavailable rental or purchase on Amazon Prime (or you can grab a DVD version if you prefer). If you are looking for more good car movies, consider one of ourother best options on Amazon Prime.

Tony Borroz, long-time Automoblog writer, has worked on popular driving games as a content expert, as well as working for aerospace companies, software giants, and as a movie stuntman. He lives in the northeast corner of the northwest Pacific.

Original article: Winning “The True Paul Newman 50 Years Later

administrator

Related Articles